On this: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/us/politics/donald-trump-presidential-race.html … Hillary will almost certainly win but Trump will prolly do better than Mitt.
-
-
the big question is would that have dampened his appeal. Flip side of what if Kasich/Bush/whoever ran? Base didn't want them.
-
Yup. But that's why I say just one. No one *sees* a professional field organization. It just works.
-
That said, I'm still getting panty hose catalogs on account of Mitt's attempt to merge my mother & I in his data, so...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the scariest part of an already terrifying election cycle.
-
Yes. I believe we've dodged a bullet. But not by much.
-
I assume continued demographic shifts will ensure it won't come this close again. But it will still take a long time to be in the clear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
or 3) Had any intention of actually winning
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and imagine how well Bernie would have done if the DNC did not interfere with his campaign.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if Trump could run a professional org or be kept in check, he wouldnt be Trump. He'd be a completely different person/candidate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4-8 more years of manmade disasters and US will elect somebody who thinks the only problem with Hitler was that he was too nice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dunno, "keeping him in check", might have cost him votes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.