Pity "reporters" keep endorsing a piece that is obviously misleading. But that's how "reporters" roll these days.https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/794534767169597441 …
-
-
-
Replying to @magicbravosolo
1) How investigation started 2) motivation to avoid FOIA etc 3) Colin Powell, for starters.
@TrexPushups@joshtpm2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think it's pretty clear she didn't want FOIA personnel looking though personal email.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @magicbravosolo
Yes. Which is made clearer if one is honest abt how State got her emails. Yglesias is not.
@TrexPushups@joshtpm1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
really? She turned over what she had and then State reconstructed rest no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @magicbravosolo
emptywheel Retweeted emptywheel
Here's my thread from today. https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/794526011849252864 …
@TrexPushups@joshtpmemptywheel added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
you seem to make a big deal about a double standard. Who was jailed for similar usage?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @magicbravosolo
Or service members whose emails ALSO didn't show classified markers but for whom intent was shown?
@TrexPushups@joshtpm1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
that's different usage. 1) military law different. 2) intent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I agree absence of evidence on intent means Hillary doesn't get charged. I'm not faulting that.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @magicbravosolo
But 1) This was not about her using a server, it was abt classified info, for better and worse (and I think CIA fucked her)
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @magicbravosolo
2) obvious people--Chelsea Manning and Jeffrey Sterling, especially--whom Hillary or aides have thrown in prison for same
0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.