There's no evidence any of them are new. @cruickshank
And non-political prosecutors who 1) know the law, including McDonnell precedent and 2) have seen the evidence don't agree.
-
-
as of when, though? My understanding was they made that judgment in Feb but much more evidence has been gathered since, per WSJ
-
You mean they've read a public book 2 more times?
-
my reading was that they have more info from other public corruption cases gathered in field offices in Los Angeles & Miami
-
One secret recording. Not much else that's not public. And PIN has reviewed that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(appreciate the info btw! don't mean to be a jerk abt this & it's obviously tough w/ dueling leaks of dubious value everywhere)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.