I'm still wondering how you can be sure of that without seeing evidence & knowing what was in those 650k emails of new evidence
-
-
was it his idea to give them all deferred prosecution agreemnts? honestly not sure but my understanding was that came from above
-
mostly I credit him with busting up corrupt NY politicians on both sides of the aisle
-
Precisely the reputation Comey came into FBI with too.
-
shrug, I guess we'll see. Given what's known about CF, I guess I'm just willing to entertain idea that inv is legit & necessary.
-
And non-political prosecutors who 1) know the law, including McDonnell precedent and 2) have seen the evidence don't agree.
-
as of when, though? My understanding was they made that judgment in Feb but much more evidence has been gathered since, per WSJ
-
You mean they've read a public book 2 more times?
-
my reading was that they have more info from other public corruption cases gathered in field offices in Los Angeles & Miami
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.