5/5 Corruption Section is risk adverse to investigation a potential future president. That is wrong.
Aren't you contradicting yourself? PIN not politically appointed. Your logic is decision of career appointees ALSO political?
-
-
Maybe. But some PIN are political appointees. My opinion stems from years of politically motivated prosecutive decisions by USAO
-
Don't you mean PIN appointees are *picked* by political appointees?
-
Yes. Picked by political appointees. DOJ is no different than any other political bureaucracy.
-
You do know you live in a democracy, right? That's how we allegedly keep democratic control over our institutions?
-
Yes. But as a career investigator, I have plenty of examples of career prosecutors blocking investigations for political reasons
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was a quick response to
@DevlinBarrett's article. If you want in depth analysis you'll have to pay me. LoL!#NobodyGetsPaidThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.@AllThingsHLS Might a better conclusion be that Ted Stevens and Bob McDonnell cases have shown limits to their authority?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.