If the IC wants their denials to be credible, then they should not deny things they've done, which they won't do. @carwinb
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @carwinb
Fair point. Though my initial response is partly colored by, Why would they hack this guy? Not exactly crown jewels.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
It was far more sexy than 90% of what DC Leaks has done, and even DNC leaks. Have you read those?
@carwinb1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @carwinb
Yeah, they're mostly nothingburgers. But no one is denying those, so what's your point?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
NO ONE IS DENYING THOSE????? Sorry. Hillary camp's on the record claims they're doctored is stronger than this.
@carwinb1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @carwinb
IIRC they have said Russia is known for forgeries but have not specifically said any one email is faked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
They have suggested specific emails are false. And more generally claimed others were.
@carwinb2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ericgeller
It's stronger than the anon IC person you believe by default. So. Maybe you shouldn't believe that, then?
@carwinb2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @carwinb
I never said I believe it by default. Have a good night.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
My bad. You just suggested this was credible. Apologies. @carwinb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.