I'm not sure how this claim ended up in a letter presumably written by lawyers who've read the relevant docs. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yahoo-nsa-congress-idUSKCN12P2FL …pic.twitter.com/Mt9dP4y9DU
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yeah, both have jurisdiction over FISA. And the JCs now get dissemination on major FISA decisions.
One can read JCs' involvement as yes, Yahoo was major FISA decision or that Admin worried that JCs thought it was. Or both. :-)
Well, even SSCI had apparently not seen order (given that people that seemed to be closer to the ICs had first claimed 702)
If that's right, then IC didn't think it was a major order. Hell, maybe FISC didn't even issue an opinion.
Point is, a lot of people seem to misunderstand how "facility" works, but that stems from 2007 decisions on Title I, not 702.
After my re-read of your post, "facility" to IC & courts has now Red Queen-morphed just like "collection". Words only IC knows.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.