Ecuador cutting off Assange's Internet access (which may have come bc of threat US would hold it responsible for leaks) 1/2
-
-
That would be based on the ridiculous assumption that the US government cares about actual proof before retaliating
-
Proof before retaliating v Russia or proof before deeming Assange a RU state actor, so as to pursue different indictment?
-
I believe they want to silence Assange to avoid embarrassment & as a first step to pressuring Ecuador into handing him over
-
I believe they'll get Ecuador to hand him over more easily if they can show he was actively coordinating w/RU.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How about a simple case of the host set down rules for its guest. Not using safe harbour for certain things would be obv.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would JA be involved in any chain of custody? He doesn't have a bank of servers in that embassy. No reason that net is used.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
>I think you are exactly right here. This is a definite upping of the ante.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.