Lifestyle polygraphs are pretty uncommon. No military working for NSA has one either (generally).
-
-
Replying to @flyryan @emptywheel
I had no idea that was the case. How's that justified? NSA CIV poly section on "deviant sexual behavior" is...for fun?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @flyryan
I thought anyone with direct access to NSAnet had to pass the full scope?
@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @emptywheel
Nope. I hadn’t even had a poly the first 5 1/2 years of my career and had to get a CI when I got to the Fort.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And I actually sat at home on extended house-hunting until my CI came through cause it was needed for NSANet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Now USCC has a place they send people while they wait on their poly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flyryan
Positing 1) Snowden moved to Booz to get cyber info he couldn't get 2) He got data incl provider names there
@Susan_Hennessey1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @flyryan
Would there have been differential access WHILE he was at Booz training?
@Susan_Hennessey1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
Snowden should have had a full-scope from his time at CIA that likely carried over. I don’t know for sure.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But he didn’t have different requirements because he was still an NSA contractor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK. I'm mostly wondering why provider names were (appear to have been) avail at Booz in MD, not HI. @Susan_Hennessey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.