News orgs have decided to report Podesta e-mails as newsworthy. But what's the right standard in an era of potentially pervasive hacking?
-
-
Does that mean the people criticizing her security measures are taking advantage of the insecurity?
@nickconfessore@pashulman -
AFAWK, all the DNC hacking was phishing. Hard to protect against that.
@nickconfessore@pashulman -
That doesn't address the q? Those willing to criticize the security are using fruits of insecurities.
@nickconfessore@pashulman -
EVERYONE using fruits of normal human behavior, not insecurity. That's part of
@nickconfessore's q abt newsworthiness@pashulman
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The idea that Assange is trying to swing this election misses the point-he's always sought to make
-
those governing so paranoid to operate as they always have so it just can't function anymore. There's nothing
-
in Cinton's or Podesta's or anyone's hacked emails that's much different from what you'd find throughout gov't.
-
And especially out of context, it can look ugly. But selectively broadcasting it without FOIA safeguards
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You have a fact check you want to present?
@pashulman@nickconfessore
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But political comms have long been the target of rat-fucking, even if normally exclusively domestic.
@pashulman -
there's something to be said for the "read aloud by the New York Times at a deposition" standard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.