Sure. But even if we disagree (we do!) my point was about Europeans, who have specific laws abt it.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
They are already complaining. And if they complain based on an abject misunderstanding of what's actually occurring, then what?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daveschroeder
They're not. They're complaining bc ODNI made false representations abt what happens w/ISP data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @daveschroeder
You've read ODNI's representations in the Privacy Shield negotiation closely?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I have. Not sure how you can come to that conclusion based on numerous wild contradictions in reporting on Yahoo! issue alone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daveschroeder
So you're familiar that Litt didn't even address 12333 at first? And made representations about what upstream entailed?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
How would you suggest this and other topics be represented from standpoint of public description of implementation & oversight?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I did. I disagree with characterization that it's false or misrepresentation in context of extreme complexity of implementation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So your suggestion is that, when negotiating w/allies, you should only given partial disclosure at risk of screwing US biz?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.