NSA almost certainly used 702 to find signatures of Inspire downloads, gotten purely domestic comms all the time.
So long as one party overseas, collex would be OK under 702 (tho agree it's FISA) @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
-
-
But 1 point of post is, if they GET to email via sig, not person, how foreignness?
@Richardson_Mich@granick@charlie_savage -
How do they establish foreignness, for 702 purposes? Trying to understand yr shorthand
-
Yes. State-sponsored terror sig itself "foreign" but 1 email user'd have to be too
@Richardson_Mich@granick@charlie_savage -
Agreed, but at this point there's no indication of targeting based on user foreignness
-
Under FISA, no need. If 702, it's part of targeting procedures now
@Richardson_Mich@granick@charlie_savage -
Agreed! I think we're arguing about how we agree, somehow :-) Sometimes I hate Twitter
-
More fun question--whether Title I or 702, why agree to make custom wiretap mods...
-
...when strong arg that only CALEA entities have to do that sort of thing?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure that's right if collection requires *searching* domestic comms
-
But they do that under upstream 702 now, right?
@KevinBankston@Richardson_Mich@granick@charlie_savage
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.