BTW, dueling sources aside, this is why 702 makes no sense for e-mail scan order: there was chance it could pick up purely-domestic-soil msgpic.twitter.com/3sTxWC4pYw
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But who is "they"? If user of terrorist method is overseas, it'd be okay under 702 @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
"They" being parties to the communications being targeted.
So long as one party overseas, collex would be OK under 702 (tho agree it's FISA) @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
But 1 point of post is, if they GET to email via sig, not person, how foreignness? @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
How do they establish foreignness, for 702 purposes? Trying to understand yr shorthand
Yes. State-sponsored terror sig itself "foreign" but 1 email user'd have to be too @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
Agreed, but at this point there's no indication of targeting based on user foreignness
Under FISA, no need. If 702, it's part of targeting procedures now @Richardson_Mich @granick @charlie_savage
Agreed! I think we're arguing about how we agree, somehow :-) Sometimes I hate Twitter
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.