Not just Upstream, but "about" surveillance, right?
-
-
Replying to @JameelJaffer @normative
Upstream IS "about" surveillance, by definition.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LizaGoitein
It can be NSA getting non-PRISM provider accounts.
@JameelJaffer@normative1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Could be, but I doubt they waited until 2015 to ask for that capability.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative @emptywheel and
I would like confirmation that "directive" (not, say, "order") was the correct word.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
Directive may also mean FISC order that is similar to 702 one, no?
@normative@LizaGoitein@JameelJaffer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @normative and
It may mean nothing if writer/source didn't understand it's a legal term of art.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @emptywheel and
Could it be anything other than an 1881a(h) directive?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JameelJaffer @charlie_savage and
That's the question. I can't think what else it could be.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LizaGoitein @JameelJaffer and
Again, Exec has expanded surveil based on Emergency before. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/10/04/yahoo-scans-closely-followed-obamas-cybersecurity-emergency-declaration/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And that's both WITH and WITHOUT FISC approval.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.