2/2 almost makes a useful point, if proper caveats are included
-
-
Haider would also be worth mentioning as a rule-proving exception
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if you fundamentally rewrite the sentence it does indeed make sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This is what editors are for. Pretty sure I understand Zack's point but it's a sloppy sentence
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidKlion
Alternately one might say American & Euro dynamic different & see Trump as continuation of trend
@adamjohnsonNYC@zackbeauchamp1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You mean a continuation of the GOP's rightward drift? If so I agree but also see Euro parallels
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidKlion
But I think people give GOP a pass on their dog whistle racism. Diff w/Trump is explicitness.
@adamjohnsonNYC@zackbeauchamp1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I mostly agree but the business elites of the party see immigration different than Trump/the base
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidKlion
Some of the ones who've endorsed Hillary?
@adamjohnsonNYC@zackbeauchamp1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Well yeah, starting with the Bushes, to the extent they have/will
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Meg Whitman, the Neocons, etc etc @adamjohnsonNYC @zackbeauchamp
-
-
also there's a substantive (NOT moral) diff btwn instrumentalized racism & racism as core agenda
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidKlion @emptywheel and
You know who understands this well? Our old friend Putin. He's racist only when he needs to be.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.