I'd try staffing it properly first....(i.e. designees)
-
-
Replying to @Krhawkins5 @MiekeEoyang
Right. Maybe this is all Nunes. But how do all members sign this? Damning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
it's not good. And I thought Schiff had some promise as a ranker...I blame new members w/o cleared staff less
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Krhawkins5
Bart raises publicly falsifiable claims. I raise a thing NSA's own FOIA rebuts. & that's b4 bad faith of it
@MiekeEoyang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
yeah but House members & staff are generalists. Don't get me wrong, it would've set off my spidey senses, but....
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Krhawkins5 @emptywheel
when Ds were in charge, we had actual former prosecutors so investigations held to a higher standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
That may be true. But every Dem signed this. Every one.
@Krhawkins52 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Krhawkins5
I'm interested in the response of the Dem staff to you and Barton. Which I hope the classified sheds light on
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
You may hope. But they've already released claims that are falsifiable. They've already done their damage.
@Krhawkins51 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Krhawkins5
again, on that I cannot agree or disagree and so if your premise rests on that fact, again, I reserve judgment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's fair. But that is basis for my furor. This was clear propaganda, based on facts I've learned from IC docs @Krhawkins5
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.