I think that's shortsighted. And honestly, you'd be more pissed if it actually happened.
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
I might have agreed before this report. But this report is singularly disqualifying. It's propaganda. Shut it down.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
that is so wrong. You know that committee oversight varies with chairs. Replace Nunes maybe. Shut it down? No.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Every Single Member signed this 3-page shit show (that you don't agree is one). Every one. Shut it down.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
I'd try staffing it properly first....(i.e. designees)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Krhawkins5 @MiekeEoyang
Right. Maybe this is all Nunes. But how do all members sign this? Damning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
it's not good. And I thought Schiff had some promise as a ranker...I blame new members w/o cleared staff less
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Krhawkins5
Bart raises publicly falsifiable claims. I raise a thing NSA's own FOIA rebuts. & that's b4 bad faith of it
@MiekeEoyang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
yeah but House members & staff are generalists. Don't get me wrong, it would've set off my spidey senses, but....
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Krhawkins5
So if they're too generalist to read publicly released info on the subject of their 3 pages ... shut them down.
@MiekeEoyang1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
We CANNOT have HPSCI members vouch for false facts. CANNOT. It is the height of perverted oversight. @MiekeEoyang
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.