That you made claims about "nit-picking" w/o actually having read the criticisms? Those reasons?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
you are going to give yourself an aneurism if you keep on like this. Take a deep breath and step away from the keyboard for 5.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Look. Admit you made "nitpicking" claims from a stance of ignorance. It's not my aneurism. It's you trying to avoid that detail
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
no, my use of "nit pick" is about the relative importance of Snowden's training in the grand scheme of damage to US.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
OK. Well, I'm of the stance that if HPSCI can't release 3 pages w/o factual errors we should shut them down.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I think that's shortsighted. And honestly, you'd be more pissed if it actually happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
I might have agreed before this report. But this report is singularly disqualifying. It's propaganda. Shut it down.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
that is so wrong. You know that committee oversight varies with chairs. Replace Nunes maybe. Shut it down? No.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Every Single Member signed this 3-page shit show (that you don't agree is one). Every one. Shut it down.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I get that. I respect that. Let's talk after you've actually read the problems with it. They're infuriating.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.