Then you're saying HPSCI made the wrong emphasis in their report, choosing character assassination over facts? We agree then!
I might have agreed before this report. But this report is singularly disqualifying. It's propaganda. Shut it down.
-
-
Again, there is a credible case to make. HPSCI chose not to do that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that is so wrong. You know that committee oversight varies with chairs. Replace Nunes maybe. Shut it down? No.
-
Every Single Member signed this 3-page shit show (that you don't agree is one). Every one. Shut it down.
-
I'd try staffing it properly first....(i.e. designees)
-
Right. Maybe this is all Nunes. But how do all members sign this? Damning.
-
it's not good. And I thought Schiff had some promise as a ranker...I blame new members w/o cleared staff less
-
Bart raises publicly falsifiable claims. I raise a thing NSA's own FOIA rebuts. & that's b4 bad faith of it
@MiekeEoyang -
yeah but House members & staff are generalists. Don't get me wrong, it would've set off my spidey senses, but....
-
So if they're too generalist to read publicly released info on the subject of their 3 pages ... shut them down.
@MiekeEoyang - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.