Because you admitted you defended HPSCI w/o reading me or @bartongellman? As "nit-picking"?https://twitter.com/MiekeEoyang/status/777698244063326208 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
no that is the relative weight I give to the general thrust of a damage assessment to the nation vs. things on Snowden.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Then you're saying HPSCI made the wrong emphasis in their report, choosing character assassination over facts? We agree then!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
don't put words in my mouth. My view of Snowden's character is not the same as yours.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
What you're saying is that a report on actual damage would be useful, w/o obviously false facts? if so we agree.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
My comment COMPLETELY unrelated to Snowden's character and entirely based on HPSCI releasing report w/obvious misleading claims
7:47 PM - 18 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.