So now you're accusing NSA IG of being mistaken? All other oversight fails so HPSCI doesn't?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
no I'm not. I'm just saying there may be more to this story that explains the discrepancy and not assuming malice.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
The only way you can be right is if 1) IG reports and 2) Semiannual reports are utterly worthless. Is that your answer?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm not litigating this with you. And certainly not at 10 pm on a Sunday. I'm withholding judgement on quality of report until
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
OK. But two of us who know details in granular detail have raised NOT nitpicking issues but factual issues.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
So before you start defending HPSCI, maybe do that kind of granular work. Fleitz has not done it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
I am no HPSCI apologist as you know from my writings and testimony. I won't offer a granular assessment on incomplete info.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Sure. But if they made claims that are misleading or wrong in 3 page report, they are propagandists, not overseers.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
the view that the HPSCI report puts out, that released info wasn't just about USP data and caused great harm, is not disproved.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Well maybe they should have left it there, rather than making falsifiable claims?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But when "oversight" comm makes false claims, then we are invited to just dismiss congressional oversight as propaganda.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.