Again, there's a respectable anti-pardon case to be made. But then Fred Fleitz is on their side, which discredits it all.
-
-
Btw, when I asked NSA some questions to help them clarify this story they went nuclear, after promising to cooperate.
-
I don't work for and don't defend the NSA, as you know. But, I've noticed that they get upset when they have an exculpatory...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'll take a look at the Gellman piece which I haven't read yet, but like I said, I'm reserving judgement
-
Have you read my piece? Based on unclassified NSA docs? https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/09/15/if-snowden-doesnt-know-privacy-protections-of-702-thats-a-problem-with-nsa-training/ …
-
yeah I did. Not being privvy to implementation, i don't know specifics. But, in my experience many kinds of training on programs
-
So you think SV head was lying?
-
It's simple. Either he was lying in prep for comms to Adm Rogers, or Snowden ultimately passed that. Very very simple.
-
No, I think you may be making assumptions about what constitutes training that may not be accurate. But I don't know, which
-
So now you're accusing NSA IG of being mistaken? All other oversight fails so HPSCI doesn't?
-
Actually not JUST IG would have to be wrong here, so would NSD and ODNI. Cause that's ALSO in their reports.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.