Why I'm interested @jacklgoldsmith said Snowden most damaging: more than OPM or Jeffrey Delisle @Krhawkins5
-
-
yeah, I basically just don't trust IC's damage assessments at all.
-
Fair. But had Delisle not precede Snowden RU behavior towards Snowden might have been different
@danielschuman@jacklgoldsmith
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can easily believe there was very significant damage that can't be fully disclosed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but, you know, the whole boy-who-cried-wolf thing.
-
Rather than say damage is great but secret, IC chose to say Snowden led to adoption of encryption
-
yes, & this shows what I mean about public interest leaks not being easily separated from rest
-
FWIW, I think there's not a chance in hell public interest would every work
-
can you elaborate?
-
Between what I saw in Sterling case (where Snowden would be tried) and Manning precedent USG has gamed trials beyond such things
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.