Plus the Russian language hyperlinks and other metadata in docs, and analysis of later communications with reporters.
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
So yeah, you think it (a case many people revised afterwards) was a strong case, and I still laugh at some of the claims.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Your premise being G2.0 is unrelated to Russia, obtained docs in manner unrelated to RU hack, and then faked Russian links?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Say, did you notice that G 1.0 potential attempted hacks of Clinton came from UK/RU IPs?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Just trying to get to underlying logic. Is it that IC is wrong on Russian state actors being behind hacks?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Anyway, back to G 1.0. FBI insinuated after he found Hillary server he may have tried to hack in hiding behind RU IP.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
I'm genuinely curious why G 1.0 potential use of RU IP doesn't raise same alarm that G 2.0 does.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
because the G2 attribution isn't based on their use of a Russian IP
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
What is it? I've never seen anything that didn't make fairly big logical leaps/admit it is inconclusive.
@Susan_Hennessey1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
same malware and control servers as Bundestag and Ukraine govt hacks for a start
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
I'll add that I've heard evidence that--particularly given Putin's claims--may be counterproof. @Susan_Hennessey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.