But my larger oppo to the piece is it tries way too hard to prove a case for which there is a lot of counterevidence.
-
-
All I see is “State worked with DOJ” on Cablegate. How could they not? it was a leak of State Dept. cables!
-
Importantly: I am not challenging the idea that FBI is harassing WL. I’m saying: that’s not HRC.
-
Yes. And I'm not saying that's all there is.
-
I’d be very interested in hearing what else there is, because, again, this particular claim a thing with me.
-
Sure. Go ahead and read the posts, and the underlying links.
-
I’ve read “The Other Factor”, and all the other links seem to lead back there. Besides DOJ/State investigation: what?
-
So you've not read other links (incl to NYT) & the other post I've linked and missed things in that post. So keep reading. Gotta go!
-
k, thx!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The linked piece about HRC, btw, Fisher was the origin of the files, but WL the reason they were published unredacted, right?
-
You made a correction, which disposed of WL’s responsibility in Turkey dump, putting it on Fisher. Is that accurate?
-
You have a habit of not using links. Should I just not put them in posts at all?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.