In their hit job on WikiLeaks, NYT claims the TPP leak helped Russia. They left out they were partners on that storypic.twitter.com/hV5YAyCMv5
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Oh. That appears to be a clear violation of NYT policy, on several grounds. If they won't speak on record, don't use it.
You’re saying that the NYT has a policy against anonymous sources?
NYT's policy prohibits anon for speculation (which this is), frowns on political stories (this is).http://www.poynter.org/2016/new-york-times-cracks-down-on-anonymous-sources/401785/ …
It allows it when they could not otherwise publish story (not true here) preferably w/addl corroborating info (none here).
Those policies put into place to avoid anon hit jobs, which this is (again, based off silly premise Putin = loudest TPP critic).
I think it’s pretty clear from context that they mean “critic” geopolitically.
No. That's batshit. Also not true.
Sorry, not trying to be combative, but genuinely don’t follow this last tweet.
There's nothing about the context that indicates a geopolitical caveat, nor would the assertion be true if made abt Putin.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.