In their hit job on WikiLeaks, NYT claims the TPP leak helped Russia. They left out they were partners on that storypic.twitter.com/hV5YAyCMv5
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I guess for starters I’d object to the idea that the NYT is “protecting” sources who refuse to speak on the record.
Oh. That appears to be a clear violation of NYT policy, on several grounds. If they won't speak on record, don't use it.
You’re saying that the NYT has a policy against anonymous sources?
NYT's policy prohibits anon for speculation (which this is), frowns on political stories (this is).http://www.poynter.org/2016/new-york-times-cracks-down-on-anonymous-sources/401785/ …
It allows it when they could not otherwise publish story (not true here) preferably w/addl corroborating info (none here).
Those policies put into place to avoid anon hit jobs, which this is (again, based off silly premise Putin = loudest TPP critic).
I think it’s pretty clear from context that they mean “critic” geopolitically.
No. That's batshit. Also not true.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.