I'm certainly not a tech-level expert, but the people that do this seem to be pointing to a tie.
-
-
Replying to @AndyMcCanse
You're overstating what they've said, and ignored counterevidence. @achadjohnson
@Milbank2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AndyMcCanse
You should start by understanding DNC is one entity. Not 5. WL is another entity. @achadjohnson
@Milbank1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Milbank
I have to teach. Please direct me to what you'd like me to read & I will do so.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndyMcCanse
You're not capable of doing own research into 5 different groups? Please. I'm not your research asst @achadjohnson
@Milbank1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Milbank
I provided you with 2 links to show you what I'm reading. I was asking for the same courtesy.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndyMcCanse
Let me start w/something so basic my freshmen might understand. There are 5 groups here. Not just DNC @achadjohnson
@Milbank2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Milbank
Ok, I'm to debate or learn from you, Marcy, but I don't appreciate being belittled.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndyMcCanse
Basic point: there are GRU and FSB, Guccifer, DC Leaks, WL, CyberBerkut, Rels bt unproven. @achadjohnson
@Milbank1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Even there, claims abt, say, Guccifer are fluid. FBI has never affirmatively stated DNC > Guccifer > WL @achadjohnson @Milbank
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.