Could do. Better still could record but not look at PCTNs until likely DRAS-ness has been established (ie checking phone# dialled)
-
-
Replying to @pwnallthethings
The only restriction is "no investigative purpose." Not "no look. Plus, "protect national security" is exception
@ncardozo1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
Not to mention obvious add-on uses for precedents. It's a shit show. But just what ODNI wanted from Fast Track
@ncardozo2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @NCardozo
yes. It sets a very wide 4A free zone between collection and use; much wider than was necessary for what ODNI needed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
Not "sets." Again, this has been rule for long time. "Codifies at Circuit level" thanks to USAF.
@ncardozo1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NCardozo
that's my point. Also means USAF phone metadata prog can collect PCTNs in bulk.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
More likely PRTT. This fixes a lot they've been fighting w/PRTT since 2009. Tho still USAF selection term limits
@ncardozo1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think as late as 2011, they had probs bc NSA intook in headers stuff that counted as content. @ncardozo
-
-
wait I thought they were only collecting metadata? :o
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.