No. According to this, it's not the IC's job to secure your systems.
-
-
Replying to @ErrataRob
It's not the IC's job to secure a database of clearance files for 21M people?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
The post was about 0days. It has nothing to do with OPM.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
Except the claims it makes, esp in bullet 5, are not true. Or maybe it is, which would be unfortunate for US.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Of course it's true. Stuxnet stopped a shooting war.
5 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
That doesn't make sense. 1) StuxNet helped US subject an adversarial nation 2) if StuxNet replaced war, then 5 is totally wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
The point of 5 is that we have choose an objective ("slow uranium enrichment") first, and how we pursue it second
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob @emptywheel
One option is bombs, another option is cyber. In other words, we aren't ever at a cyerwar, but just war.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
He's treating cyber as exclusively abt intel collex. It's not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ErrataRob
The original directive for the NSA was defense; see also National Security Presidential Directive 54
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
NSPD 54 may have been updated post IAD integration. Now we're going to see China stealing our data remotely in time @ErrataRob
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.