-Greenwald for certain.
-
-
Replying to @Rich_893
I haven't followed closely enough. Any link to a
@ggreenwald story?@trevortimm@JasonLeopold@emptywheel @Jkm920213@wildebees1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @richardSFO
-I used to believe that Wikileaks was legitimate, but year after year exposing U.S. secrets and not a peep about Russia?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rich_893
OK now that u mention it, that's interesting. No
#whistleblowers or#leaks re#Russian advances in Ukraine. Is@wikileaks Russian?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Rich_893
If one of those journalists wld confirm the assertion, I would rapidly be persuaded. Not blind to Assange &
#DNCLeaks@wikileaks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @richardSFO @wikileaks
-Well of course they are not going to confirm it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rich_893
Well if there is fire, there must be smoke. Have any done investigative pieces on
#DNCLeaks?@wikileaks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Rich_893
Ok. Well the very best
#nationalsecurity analyst I've ever read is@emptywheel. I may search her blog...@wikileaks4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Also relevant and forgotten of late: https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/07/26/the-other-factor/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.