Classic gov; generate oversight body for non-existing processes. How about - practitioners first, board late.https://twitter.com/dotMudge/status/764827563214635008 …
-
-
Yeah, can't solve everything. But someone pragmatic should prioritize biggest threats and try to mitigate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and you cant fix or ramp up to fix it by just hiring a big group of techies in DC and pretending that'll work.
-
big difficulty will be how you can distribute the security testing nationally to take account of bespoke needs
-
At the very least guide how to identify concentrations of PII, generate procedures to handle them responsibly
-
yes, but the board don't need to know that. They need to be good at contacting / hiring in people who know that.
-
I'm not sold on the idea that a board is needed to facilitate that step, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Politics be politicking
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.