If it had been our covert op, we'd say it was a hands down success, and we'd be right.
-
-
Replying to @Timothy_Edgar
A lot of people who've had their PII exposed, if that was done by Putin, they've been injured. But DWS resigning? Nope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
It's not about her. It's about a foreign power influencing our election. I don't want Russians hacking RNC either.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Timothy_Edgar
Sure. And in the future that might happen. Please stop suggesting it has bc it's factually false.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm not suggesting it, I'm saying it because it happened. We will have to agree to disagree.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Timothy_Edgar
You do know that having a more competent person running DNC for 3 months will help Democrats do better? You understand that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
1 of 2) Look, this is just silly. Russians were not trying to help Dems. You don't have to like DWS to find it very disturbing
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Timothy_Edgar
Who said I didn't find it disturbing? Now you're making stuff up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
You said there was no damage. I call it damage.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Timothy_Edgar
But we don't know that yet. What we do know is Dems used hack as excuse to rid themselves of someone who was hurting party
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That they were able to use hack as excuse meant an action that would have been done anyway done more cheaply. Politics!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.