At least Morell and Bloomberg, et al. have a stake in not burning it all down.
-
-
-
What is the "it" there. Because I have no evidence that "me" or "the rest of the world" are included in "it."
-
Fair enough. But we'll get longer to influence "it," I think, than if "they" lose.
-
"we" will have influence over all these oligarchs and imperialists? What change will come about to make that happen?
-
Dunno. But I'd rather get shit on for a while and try to figure out how not to get shit on than thrown off a cliff.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hold your nose, click heels 3x & think to yourself "Liberal SCOTUS!" Dreams of repealed Citizens United gets me thru anything!
-
I think the term is "democratic" SCOTUS, including Merrick Garland, who is not liberal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Feel free to be unexcited by both.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is disgusting. Clinton could win w progressive base. Instead, she's going with Hawks and Billionaires. So disappointing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.