Forget emails. US voting machines are ridiculously insecure. I wrote once about one with hardwired password "admin".https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/27/by-november-russian-hackers-could-target-voting-machines/ …
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
not just the voting terminals, either, but also the systems that provision them and tally results.
1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
I kid you not; Turkey is better. Votes counted openly; tallied in parallel by adversarial parties. (Turkey has other problems!
)1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
As
@mattblaze and@avirubin know very well, it's hard to find a CS person who likes computerized voting systems.1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Turkey has: paper ballots; open count adversarial attended; parallel adversarial tally; quick results.
8 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Replying to @zeynep
Much of US has adversarial observation. In some scantron states could find irregularities @SteveBellovin @mattblaze @avirubin
1:03 PM - 28 Jul 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.