Two problems w/claims abt Russian hack: 1) Lots of sources saying "Russia" described as US official which can be MoC (therefore biased)
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Some claims coming from people I've already heard of penciled in for position for Hillary NatSec spots.
2 replies 24 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
In other words, credibility of "Intelligence" sources during week of political convention even more fraught than FBI just blabbing as usual
2 replies 13 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
true. But I did read we are up to five cyber security firms saying this has their finger prints?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grizzleeman
Some of those are derivative. Others I've read and found really unconvincing.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @grizzleeman
So this article (http://www.vocativ.com/343010/guccifer-2-0-dnc-hack/ …) claims that he used Russian VPN that was ONLY IN RUSSIAN, so he must be
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This journalist didn't see the English translation button in the top right cornerpic.twitter.com/pgjY768yMj
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
That's based off this in the actual TC report. @grizzleemanpic.twitter.com/KPrLxCQX0D
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.