@tqbf slate made a similar point the other day. If Russia hacked these msgs, they'd be pretty bored. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2016/07/hillary_s_email_scandal_was_overhyped.html …
-
-
-
Especially since they probably already had them after owning up all of State.
-
and presumably have other means of monitoring drone strikes anyway
-
Right. But by treating them as ORCON CIA prevents most MoCs from figuring that out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
NOt necessarily clear. If they're squeamish bc one strike in question is really sensitive--like those after Ray Davis--it could.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@thegrugq well written, good stuffThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the CIA also covered up the missile attack on TWA flight 800 because it was during Clinton's reelection. .I see a pattern
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
actionable record, compliance review, any possoble extravtion/suppprt. Up to 8 or 9 per strike plus back and forth items?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chain involves back and forth on signature strikes? Basically 3 or more mssg, per event. Disclosure, authorization, confirm,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.