So re-reading Comey's exact remarks a bit more carefully, noticed two things: 1) The TS emails were TS/SAR, not TS/SCI
I think Comey played up what was there, given prior reports, including buying everything CIA claimed. @flyryan
-
-
oh there were multiple callbacks to press and Clinton claims.
@CNN has enumerated them. -
It may be validating older
@CNN reports, but it's stuff they've validated. It's not a rehashing of media claims -
That said, definitely felt like a "< criminal; but people deserve to know what you did isn't even nearly OK" statement.
-
I think
@EricLichtblau's piece is prolly right on. This MIGHT have been criminal b4 standards changed w/Petraeus.@flyryan -
I don't think so. I can't see any set of facts that solidly show criminal wrongdoing enough to hang a prosecution on
-
She had a private, secret server set up that she used for classified SoS business. Should be enough.
-
If FBI thought they could prove even that, they'd recommend criminal charges.
-
FRA has no teeth or this would have been easy.
@my_random_name@flyryan - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
almost felt like "if we're not gonna charge her, we are still gonna hit her hard".
-
Right. And bruise her up a bit for CIA.
@pwnallthethings
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.