It was to discuss whether he had approved Libby leaking Plame's ID. Not 911. @heathergi76 @Reince
-
-
Replying to @duker_61
Right. Bc the email destruction in that case was affirmative obstruction.
@heathergi76@Reince2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @duker_61
I guess you're missing corruption of destroyed emails after investigation announced.
@heathergi76@Reince1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @duker_61
He was punished? Nope. In any case, Comey in key role in both. He's GOP. You don't trust him?
@heathergi76@Reince2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @duker_61
Then you're predicting that Comey, having authorized Libby indictment, will not seek one here.
@heathergi76@Reince1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @duker_61
OK. Then maybe let him do his work and trust the result? @heathergi76 @Reince
5:17 AM - 4 Jul 2016
3 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.