DOJ made the criteria public in Latif: https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/latif-et-al-v-holder-et-al-joint-concise-statement-agreed-facts-relevant-all …
-
-
-
But I'm right that the OR (or the Stanford) case did get to constitutional right?
-
Yes: OR court ruled Constitution protects liberty interest in intl travel, which No Fly List infringes: https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/latif-et-al-v-holder-et-al-district-court-ruling …
-
Nailed it! (At least accurately enough for Twitter legal citation...)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still trying to figure out what they mean, though.
-
Interesting, though, that No Fly based on 2331 and not 2332, which Feinstein's amendment was.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.