Didn't say "legal fallacy". A "logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning" & meant so.
By own testimony they don't consider convos abt Constitution raising concerns. @LemonSlayerUS @Robertwaldeck @bmaz @Snowden
-
-
They don't consider vague, general discussions, correct. As you guys noted.pic.twitter.com/UUoWzNUn4t
-
Also from your piece, hence my "they searched everything" comment.pic.twitter.com/Jwb6tAAF4w
-
Yup and elsewhere it points out that they fact-checked their own Q&A to note that only incl emails able to obtain.
-
OK, but is there any evidence that they didn't take proper efforts to obtain all the comms?
-
I fully understand why they repeatedly were double checking if they had everything. Govt systems (as you know) are a mess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.