Their claims would be FAR more credible if they had written them down contemporaneously @bmaz @BradMossEsq
-
-
how could they? Had no idea he was important at the time
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Robertwaldeck
Again, they didn't write this down on 6/10/13, when asked for Snowden deets. They did on 4/09/14.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so? Its a minor convo thay does not prove his claim of bringing concerns. You yourself agreed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Robertwaldeck
I claimed it was not traditional whistleblower. Very different thing.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but it isn't even concerns. Its this guy said EOs were the same as enacted law. Not material.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Robertwaldeck
At some point the proliferation of training programs saying "12333 has precedence over FISA" matters.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Did it say that or did it say EOs have the force and effect of law? Not the same thing
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
Not all docs made the story but I've counted at least 3 instances of that equivalent
@Robertwaldeck@bmaz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A document that says an EO can trump a statute would be concerning but even OGC said it can't
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
As I said, not all docs made the story. I asked NSA abt two more. @Robertwaldeck @bmaz
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @BradMossEsq
@JasonLeopold "not all docs made the story" = there's other stories in the 800pgs, or > FOIA docs not yet released?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.