Good to see there are people who will still stooge for duplicitous govt no matter what they confront
Their claims would be FAR more credible if they had written them down contemporaneously @bmaz @BradMossEsq
-
-
If officials had to draft memos for the record for every little discussion they had with contractors....
-
... in the biggest counterintelligence investigation since at least Stellar Wind. Yes. That.
@Robertwaldeck@bmaz -
There wasn't a CI investigation going when he had the original discussion, though.
-
I agree would've been better if memo drafted in 2013, not 2014, when memory fresher
-
Would you also agree it would have been better to draft before Snowden first raised it?
@Robertwaldeck@bmaz -
Sure. Color me shocked a federal agency didn't initially do an exhaustive inquiry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
how could they? Had no idea he was important at the time
-
Again, they didn't write this down on 6/10/13, when asked for Snowden deets. They did on 4/09/14.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq -
so? Its a minor convo thay does not prove his claim of bringing concerns. You yourself agreed
-
I claimed it was not traditional whistleblower. Very different thing.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq -
but it isn't even concerns. Its this guy said EOs were the same as enacted law. Not material.
-
At some point the proliferation of training programs saying "12333 has precedence over FISA" matters.
@bmaz@BradMossEsq -
Did it say that or did it say EOs have the force and effect of law? Not the same thing
-
Not all docs made the story but I've counted at least 3 instances of that equivalent
@Robertwaldeck@bmaz - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.