Again, you made a claim for which you had no proof (and for which there was counterproof). You're the one backing off claim
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I stand by claim that Bernie has brainwashed his bots into believing a stereotype of Hillary. My "proof" is his tone/rhetoric.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Oh, so Hillary fans are fact (and logic!) free now? And yet it's Bernie's fault her negatives are spiking?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
-
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Yes. Asking for evidence. I understand for Hillary people facts ARE sputtering. Maybe THAT's why her negatives spiking?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
simple ? Is Bernie's tone/rhetoric during cpaign completely unrelated to rise in Hillary's negatives?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
I don't know. You asserted it as fact. And now you've got questions. So you now admit to maligning Bernie w/no evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Here's the point. You made a claim w/ NO EVIDENCE. And you're wondering why your candidate's negatives spiking?
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Um. So you have no evidence. No evidence, No evidence. No evidence. But still willing to attack.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.