Except her negatives were really high before Bernie. So maybe blame someone else?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
not as high and she's our nominee. They're doing Rs job for them when their campaign is effectively over. It's counterproductive
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Yes, and Hillary doing far worse drove up Obama's nega--oh wait. No. That didn't happen. Maybe your facts suck?
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
-
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
I'm sorry. Pointing out that your tweet was fact-free self-serving claptrap is "pissy"? Maybe adhere to some facts??
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm just saying lots of individuals are being sold a cliche about Clinton. Will it matter ultimately? Probably not.Still a shame
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Sorry. No. You said BERNIE sold a Hillary cliche. Any evidence for that, given her high negatives before that?
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
her negs have grown during the course of the campaign. Is that coincidental? Is his tone/rhetoric completely unrelated?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TrueFactsStated
Hillary ran VERY vigorous campaign v Obama, even seeded the "palling with terrorist" claim. His negatives didn't go up
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
you're still talking about 2008. I'm talking about 2016. Is his tone/rhetoric completely unrelated to rise in her negs? Answer ?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You made claim. It is YOUR job to prove it, not mine. You might consider her OWN actions, email scandal, GOP other factors
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.