You mean the search of raw 702 data they do in normal criminal enforcement investigations doesn't implicate SIGINT? Really?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @benjaminwittes
Probably not unless it's international criminal matters
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DumbJosh
Sorry. That is not what the public record indicates.
@benjaminwittes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @benjaminwittes
Not every FBI investigation involves TS//SCI personnel and it would be logistically difficult anyway
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DumbJosh
Correct. But as public record indicates it doesn't take TS/SCI to learn there's 702 data there.
@benjaminwittes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @benjaminwittes
can you explain a little more? Sigint is TS and I doubt you can query something toonly return the number of hits
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Anyway, "normal criminal investigation" probably wouldn't involve the 702 team I think
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DumbJosh
Also note, FBI's 702 MPs permit sharing of data w/NCMEC, which suggests they're using it for kiddie porn.
@benjaminwittes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @benjaminwittes
From quick skimming, it appears this just lets DOJ acquire intel on non-US citizens outside the US. Same as NSA.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So...International crime
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nope. International speech. 702 =/= crime standard. @benjaminwittes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.