Are you advocating firing for "I suspect" evidence? & if the same were used against those he insulted?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm not advocating firing or not firing. Scroll up. I'm saying there's a difference between proximal and ultimate causation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leahmcelrath
Sorry. Everything else was demographic swamp divorced from evidence. That tweet was you expressing your "suspicion."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Neither is there "evidence" he was fired specifically for the tweets (as is being alleged). That's all based on suspicion too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leahmcelrath
Oh. But you just decided to tweet out 100 tweets based on that premise?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
100 tweets? Stop being hostile and trying to provoke a fight. I respect you, Marcy. We can disagree on our views of this.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leahmcelrath
If some of the people you're defending have a pattern of abusive behavior but for employers who DON'T fire for it, then what?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I do not agree with your premise he was fired for the tweets. There is no evidence to prove it. There is conjecture only.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leahmcelrath
Let me rewind. 1) original objection was to YOU twitter ranting based on what you "suspect" abt someone's firing. That's it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Don't bother to rewind, Marcy. I'm going to bed. Goodnight.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oops. "You suspect" will always be the death knell of your claim to liberalism of both sorts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.