This isn't hard. 1. Don't lash out. 2. If you do, apologize. 3. Stop egging people on to be abusive. 4. Don't fire people for tweeting.
Sorry. Everything else was demographic swamp divorced from evidence. That tweet was you expressing your "suspicion."
-
-
Neither is there "evidence" he was fired specifically for the tweets (as is being alleged). That's all based on suspicion too.
-
Oh. But you just decided to tweet out 100 tweets based on that premise?
-
100 tweets? Stop being hostile and trying to provoke a fight. I respect you, Marcy. We can disagree on our views of this.
-
If some of the people you're defending have a pattern of abusive behavior but for employers who DON'T fire for it, then what?
-
I do not agree with your premise he was fired for the tweets. There is no evidence to prove it. There is conjecture only.
-
Let me rewind. 1) original objection was to YOU twitter ranting based on what you "suspect" abt someone's firing. That's it.
-
Don't bother to rewind, Marcy. I'm going to bed. Goodnight.
-
Oops. "You suspect" will always be the death knell of your claim to liberalism of both sorts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And "a demographic swamp divorced from evidence" is a great turn of phrase. Inaccurate, but nice wording. Well-played.
-
Inaccurate bc your claims did not involve demographics divorced from, eg, what the other players have done?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.