So whence your skepticism abt defining "collect fr SIGAD" (besides James Clapper ruining that word)? @electrospaces
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
SIGAD says nothing about the underlying technologies in use and hence not necessarily clear how to count.
@electrospaces2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel
Meaning: There may not be an universally applicable way.
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
How is it measured in any case?? Actually have no idea.
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
BI charts suggest counts of DNI and DNR "records". Whether "record" has a uniform definition across all techs...
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel
... is anyone's guess.
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
Particularly given that we don't know whether an MCT or a SCT is counted as a record?
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
BI is (was?) metadata only, so MCT vs SCT shouldn't play a role here, if I am not mistaken.
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
Let's take a step back: who's defining metadata and content?
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
FISC based on whispers from NSA, I guess.
@electrospaces4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Then actual legal definition which doesn't coincide w/those, tho some court cases are taking notice of FISC @electrospaces
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.