maybe because a partner agency has several sources that have to be grouped together, and they do that with the country name
-
-
Replying to @electrospaces
"Maybe" -- so you don't actually know? Nice, now we're getting somewhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
I never said that I know it 100% sure, but I think "my" interpretation is more plausible than Greenwald's
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
I don't care about what Greenwald thinks. All I'm saying is there are a number of open questions & no satisfactory answers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @empiricalerror @electrospaces
Let me be an asshole and interject. Have we ever seen how NSA measures--graphically--collecting from SIGADs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
1st impulse to say "define collecting from SIGADs". That aside: Don't think we've seen anything useful on that.
@electrospaces2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
I've seen things that suggest they can't tag everything which I think (and I've been assured) is batshit nuts
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I've seen those hints as well and concur.
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
So whence your skepticism abt defining "collect fr SIGAD" (besides James Clapper ruining that word)?
@electrospaces1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
SIGAD says nothing about the underlying technologies in use and hence not necessarily clear how to count.
@electrospaces2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You mean what unit to use? @electrospaces
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.